|
|
| Rebecca Saulsbury |
6/01/01 |
|
My comments are in response to Sarah's thoughtful and thought-provoking essay on feminism in the Bible-belt and to a few postings on the listserv commenting on her essay. One posting asked if feminism and Christianity are mutually exclusive in light of Sarah's experience. I am a Feminist and a Christian, and I do not believe the two are necessarily mutually exclusive. In fact, quite the contrary. My early experiences with Christianity were somewhat different from Sarah's, as I was baptized in and attended an Episcopal church across the street from the University of California at Berkeley in the late 1960s and 1970s. Liberal in its theology and congregation while maintaining traditional ritual practices, this church taught me, by faith and example, that Christian faith is all-inclusive, welcoming all without prejudice and treating them as equals in the body of Christ. I was only nine years old when women were first ordained in the Episcopal church, so I grew up seeing and hearing women interpret Scripture and conveying those interpretations with the authority that had previously been reserved only for men. I grew up hearing the stories of heroic women in the Bible. In Sunday services and Sunday School, I learned that Christian faith must be accompanied by a commitment to social justice, as demonstrated by Christ. As my feminist consciousness emerged in high school, my Christian faith increased, not diminished. I do not want to convey an uncomplicated, Pollyanna view of Christianity, nor do I discount feminists' critique of patriarchy and oppression in Christianity (indeed, I share those views). As many feminist theologians have pointed out, however, (and I am NOT an expert in this area), the problem seems to lie in the relationship between feminism and the development of the organized church. When the central body of Christianity organized itself based on the Roman empire, women were pushed out. However, in the "far-flung" areas of Christianity, that is, those away from Rome--Ireland, for example, women continued to play strong, active roles (equal to men) in Christianity. Hildegard Von Bingen and St. Bridget are just two examples of such women. Also, most religious conservatives (and I apologize to any who may take issue with this statement) rely on Paul's letters to individual churches to keep women down and to justify a patriarchal hierarchy. And Paul often gets a bum rap, as he was trying to help infant churches survive in an extremely hostile environment. Robin Scroggs provides an insightful, alternative, and more historically grounded interpretation of Paul's letters in Paul for a New Day (unfortunately, this book is now out of print, but check the library or buy it used at this link). Paul actually considered the long-held practice of women's subordination to men to have been overcome by Christ (see Galations, for instance). However, when considering the relationship between feminism
and Christianity, it is perhaps most Of course, I could also go into a detailed discussion about
how Christianity proved an important vantage point for nineteenth-century
white women in the first wave of the woman's movement (see for
example, Elizabeth Cady Stanton's The
Woman's Bible) and also for nineteenth-century African
American women who liberated themselves from the double bind
of chattel slavery and patriarchy.
The sheer preponderance of texts ought to prove that the two
belief systems are not, and do not have to be, mutually exclusive.
Rebecca Saulsbury (Editor's note: The last paragraph, with its recommended texts was added by me). |
|